Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
BP ›
BPIDPLUS
Trademark search for:
BPIDPLUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-04-18 — Application filed
2003-07-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
2003-07-22 — Assigned to examiner
2003-09-03 — Notice of publication
2003-09-23 — Published for opposition
2003-12-16 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-05-28 — Sou teas extension received
2004-05-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
2004-06-04 — Sou extension 1 granted
2004-11-30 — Sou teas extension received
2004-11-30 — Sou extension 2 filed
2004-12-09 — Sou extension 2 granted
2004-12-10 — Paper received
2005-01-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-05-05 — Paper received
2005-06-13 — Sou teas extension received
2005-06-13 — Sou extension 3 filed
2005-06-13 — Sou extension 3 granted
2005-09-20 — Undeliverable mail - no action taken
2005-11-23 — Sou teas extension received
2005-11-23 — Sou extension 4 granted
2005-11-23 — Sou extension 4 filed
2006-05-02 — Sou teas extension received
2006-05-02 — Sou extension 5 filed
2006-05-02 — Sou extension 5 granted
2006-12-17 — Final status recorded
2007-01-12 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-01-12 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-02-28 — Application abandoned
2007-02-28 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Privaris, Inc.
Charlottesville , VA
Privaris, Inc.
Charlottesville , VA
Correspondent
KIMBERLY A CHASTEEN WILLIAMS MULLEN 721 LAKEFRONT COMMONS, STE 200 NEWPORT NEWS, VA 23606 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-04-18
Status Date:
2006-12-17
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.