Trademark search for:

CASIO SPORT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2003-08-06 — Application filed
2004-02-21 — Assigned to examiner
2004-02-24 — Final disposition recorded
2004-06-03 — Paper received
2004-06-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-07-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-09-01 — Notice of publication
2004-09-21 — Published for opposition
2004-12-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-01-21 — Fax received
2005-06-14 — Paper received
2005-06-14 — Use amendment filed
2005-06-14 — Statement of use processing complete
2005-06-21 — Notice of allowance correction entered
2005-07-25 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2005-07-29 — Assigned to lie
2005-08-03 — Law office registration review completed
2005-09-13 — Registered-principal register
2011-09-07 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2011-09-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
2011-09-28 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-09-28 — Registered - partial sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2011-09-28 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2016-04-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-04-15 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha
Tokyo JP

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha
Tokyo JP

Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha
Tokyo JP

Correspondent

Brian J. McNamara and Norm J. Rich Foley & Lardner LLP
3000 K Street, N.W., Sixth Floor
WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5109
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-08-06

Status Date:
2016-04-15

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.