Trademark search for:

COMPOSITE SOFTWARE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2003-02-25 — Application filed
2003-08-15 — Assigned to examiner
2003-08-21 — Final disposition recorded
2004-03-29 — Paper received
2004-03-29 — Petition to revive-received
2004-04-01 — Application abandoned
2004-06-29 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-06-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-07-07 — Petition to revive-granted
2004-07-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-07-30 — Assigned to lie
2004-09-01 — Notice of publication
2004-09-21 — Published for opposition
2004-12-14 — Registered-principal register
2006-03-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2010-10-08 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2010-10-12 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2010-10-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2013-11-27 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2014-01-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-01-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2014-12-10 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2015-07-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2015-07-17 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Composite Software
San Mateo , CA

Composite Software
San Mateo , CA

Composite Software
San Mateo , CA

Correspondent

Sally M. Abel, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP
801 California street
Silicon Valley Center
Mountain View, CA 94041

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-02-25

Status Date:
2015-07-17

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.