Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
CO ›
COMPOSITE VIEW
Trademark search for:
COMPOSITE VIEW
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-03-05 — Application filed
2003-08-24 — Final disposition recorded
2003-08-24 — Assigned to examiner
2004-03-29 — Paper received
2004-03-29 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-03-29 — Petition to revive-received
2004-03-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-03-31 — Application abandoned
2004-07-07 — Petition to revive-granted
2004-07-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-08-09 — Assigned to lie
2004-08-23 — Assigned to lie
2004-09-30 — Law office publication review completed
2004-11-10 — Notice of publication
2004-11-30 — Published for opposition
2005-02-22 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-08-22 — Sou teas extension received
2005-08-22 — Teas statement of use received
2005-08-22 — Use amendment filed
2005-08-22 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-08-26 — Statement of use processing complete
2005-08-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
2005-09-06 — Final disposition recorded
2005-09-06 — Final disposition recorded
2006-03-27 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-05-19 — Application abandoned
2006-05-19 — Final status recorded
2006-05-22 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Composite Software
San Mateo , CA
Composite Software
San Mateo , CA
Correspondent
BRIAN I MARCUS VIERRA MAGEN MARCUS & DENIRO LLP 575 MARKET ST STE 2500 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-03-05
Status Date:
2006-05-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.