Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
CY ›
CYTODISCOVERY
Trademark search for:
CYTODISCOVERY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-04-21 — Application filed
2003-10-29 — Assigned to examiner
2003-11-07 — Final disposition recorded
2004-05-06 — Office action issued
2004-05-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-05-21 — Office action issued
2004-11-22 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2004-11-22 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2004-11-22 — Office action issued
2004-11-22 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2004-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-11-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-01-25 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-25 — Action denying req for recon mailed
2005-06-06 — Examiners amendment mailed
2005-06-06 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-06-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-06-10 — Assigned to lie
2005-06-20 — Law office publication review completed
2005-09-14 — Notice of publication
2005-10-04 — Published for opposition
2005-12-27 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-06-19 — Sou teas extension received
2006-06-19 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-06-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-12-28 — Final status recorded
2007-03-13 — Application abandoned
2007-03-13 — Application abandoned
2007-03-13 — Exparte appeal terminated
Owner Information
CytoDiscovery, Inc.
Palo Alto , CA
CytoDiscovery, Inc.
Palo Alto , CA
Correspondent
JAMES R ABNEY KOLISCH HARTWELL, PC 520 SW YAMHILL ST STE 200 PORTLAND OR, 97204 U.S. ARMY
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-04-21
Status Date:
2006-12-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.