Trademark search for:

DAT DUDE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2003-10-23 — Application filed
2003-11-10 — Application filed
2004-03-14 — Assigned to examiner
2004-03-15 — Final disposition recorded
2004-09-20 — Paper received
2004-09-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-10-01 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-11-10 — Office action issued
2004-11-12 — Office action issued
2004-12-07 — Paper received
2004-12-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-12-20 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-01-31 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-02-18 — Assigned to lie
2005-02-18 — Law office publication review completed
2005-05-18 — Notice of publication
2005-06-07 — Published for opposition
2005-08-30 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-02-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-03-03 — Paper received
2006-03-23 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-08-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-08-31 — Paper received
2006-09-26 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-02-28 — Paper received
2007-02-28 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-06-14 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-08-28 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-09-05 — Paper received
2007-09-28 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-02-29 — Final status recorded
2008-04-30 — Application abandoned
2008-04-30 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

WILEY, MARCELLUS
ENCINITAS , CA

WILEY, MARCELLUS
ENCINITAS , CA

Correspondent

MATTHEW A NEWBOLES STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER
75 ENTERPRISE STE 250
ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-10-23

Status Date:
2008-02-29

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.