Brandinium

Trademark search for:

KAOS MG

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2003-12-12 — Application filed
  • 2004-01-06 — Application filed
  • 2004-02-02 — Paper received
  • 2004-02-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-06-30 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-07-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-12-17 — Paper received
  • 2004-12-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-01-06 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-03-06 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-03-07 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2005-09-23 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-04-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-10-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-03-16 — Paper received
  • 2007-04-19 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-04-19 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-04-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-05-19 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-05-21 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2007-11-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-05-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-12-01 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-06-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-12-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-06-25 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-12-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-06-29 — Data modification completed
  • 2011-06-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-06-30 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-07-08 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2011-07-20 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2011-07-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-07-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-08-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2011-08-17 — Office action issued
  • 2011-08-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-08-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-09-01 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-09-14 — Notice of publication
  • 2011-09-14 — Notice of publication
  • 2011-10-04 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-12-20 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-04-04 — Teas section 8 received
  • 2017-04-20 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-04-20 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
  • 2017-04-20 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
  • 2020-03-18 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2020-04-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-04-30 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-04-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-04-30 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2020-04-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-12-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-12-14 — Teas change of domestic representatives address
  • 2020-12-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-12-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-12-20 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2022-07-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2022-07-01 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

MOTOVAN INC.
BOUCHERVILLE, QUEBEC CA
Motovan Corporation
Quebec CA
Motovan Corporation
Quebec CA
Motovan Corporation
Quebec CA

Correspondent

Rebecca A. Liebowitz VENABLE LLP
P.O. BOX 34385
Washington, DC 20043
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-12-12
Status Date:
2022-07-01
Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.