Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
MA ›
MAGILIGHT
Trademark search for:
MAGILIGHT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-12-12 — Application filed
2004-01-06 — Application filed
2004-07-21 — Assigned to examiner
2004-07-23 — Final disposition recorded
2004-12-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-01-10 — Paper received
2005-01-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-01-21 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-02-02 — Suspension letter written
2005-02-02 — Letter of suspension mailed
2005-03-25 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-08-12 — Assigned to lie
2005-08-23 — Law office publication review completed
2005-09-21 — Notice of publication
2005-10-11 — Published for opposition
2005-10-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-11-10 — Extension of time to oppose received
2006-02-03 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2006-08-29 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
2006-08-29 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2006-10-10 — Paper received
2006-10-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-10-24 — Fax received
2006-10-26 — Post publication amendment - entered
2006-10-27 — Notice of allowance correction entered
2007-04-18 — Final status recorded
2007-06-20 — Application abandoned
2007-06-20 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
BAYCOM OPTO-ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO, LTD.
HSIN-CHU TW
BAYCOM-ELECTRONICS TECHNOLOGY CO, LTD.
HSIN-CHU TW
Correspondent
NORMAN P SOLOWAY HAYES SOLOWAY PC 3450 E SUNRISE DR STE 140 TUCSON, AZ 85718 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-12-12
Status Date:
2007-04-18
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.