Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
ME ›
MEGA 50
Trademark search for:
MEGA 50
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-03-24 — Application filed
2005-03-30 — Application filed
2005-10-18 — Assigned to examiner
2005-10-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-10-21 — Assigned to lie
2005-10-24 — Law office publication review completed
2005-11-23 — Notice of publication
2005-12-13 — Published for opposition
2006-03-07 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-08-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2006-08-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2006-08-31 — Sou teas extension received
2006-08-31 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-08-31 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-03-08 — Final status recorded
2007-05-08 — Application abandoned
2007-05-08 — Application abandoned
2007-09-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-03-02 — Paper received
2009-03-20 — Review of correspondence complete
2010-06-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2010-06-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2010-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-02-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-02-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
Owner Information
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
Lane Cove, New South Wales AU
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd.
Lane Cove, New South Wales AU
Correspondent
Keith D. Moore Video Gaming Technologies, Inc. 308 Mallory Station Road Franklin, TN 37067 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-03-24
Status Date:
2007-03-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.