Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ODIN'S REIGN

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2003-12-16 — Application filed
  • 2004-01-09 — Application filed
  • 2004-02-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-07-13 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-01-19 — Paper received
  • 2005-01-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-02-22 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-03-04 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-03-07 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2005-03-07 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-05-25 — Office action issued
  • 2005-05-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-06-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2005-08-12 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-08-18 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-08-19 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-08-22 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-09-21 — Notice of publication
  • 2005-10-11 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-01-03 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2006-07-03 — Office action issued
  • 2006-07-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-07-03 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2006-07-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-09-12 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
  • 2006-10-24 — Registered-principal register
  • 2006-11-20 — Undeliverable mail - courtesy copy mailed
  • 2008-07-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2008-07-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-03-02 — Paper received
  • 2009-04-09 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2009-08-14 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2010-02-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-02-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-06-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-06-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-08-26 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2010-08-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2012-09-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-09-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-01-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-01-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-03-27 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2013-04-05 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2013-04-06 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2013-04-06 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
  • 2014-12-31 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2015-10-24 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2016-02-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-02-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-05-26 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2017-05-26 — Final status recorded
  • 2017-09-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-09-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2022-06-22 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically

Owner Information

Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
North Ryde, NSW AU
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
Lane Cove, 2066, New South Wales AU
Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
Lane Cove, 2066, New South Wales AU

Correspondent

Linda Marie Norcross Aristocrat Technologies, Inc.
7230 Amigo Street
Las Vegas, NV 89119
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-12-16
Status Date:
2017-05-26
Category:
Electronics & Software
Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.