Brandinium

Trademark search for:

OWL CAPONE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2003-01-21 — Application filed
  • 2003-04-18 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2003-04-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-05-15 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2003-05-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2003-07-02 — Notice of publication
  • 2003-07-22 — Published for opposition
  • 2003-10-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2004-02-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-04-13 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2004-04-16 — Paper received
  • 2004-05-03 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2004-10-14 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2004-10-18 — Paper received
  • 2004-11-15 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2005-04-13 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2005-04-13 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2005-04-13 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2005-10-13 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2005-10-13 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2005-10-26 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2006-04-13 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2006-04-13 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2006-07-13 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2006-09-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2006-09-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2006-10-06 — Paper received
  • 2006-10-06 — Petition to director - change basis - received
  • 2006-10-06 — Notice of allowance cancelled
  • 2006-10-17 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2006-10-25 — Petition to director - change basis - granted
  • 2006-11-07 — 1(b) basis deleted; new basis requested
  • 2006-12-07 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2006-12-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-12-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-12-07 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2006-12-07 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2006-12-07 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2006-12-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-12-28 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-12-28 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-01-31 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-02-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-05-08 — Registered-principal register
  • 2008-07-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-03-02 — Paper received
  • 2009-04-09 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2009-07-23 — Review of correspondence complete
  • 2010-02-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-02-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-06-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-06-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2010-08-26 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2010-08-26 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2012-09-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-09-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-01-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2013-01-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-12-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2013-12-13 — Final status recorded
  • 2016-02-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-02-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed

Owner Information

Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Limited
North Ryde, NSW AU
Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Limited
Lane Cove, New South Wales 2066 AU
Aristocrat Technologies Australia PTY Limited
Lane Cove, New South Wales 2066 AU

Correspondent

Keith D. Moore Video Gaming Technologies, Inc.
308 Mallory Station Road
Franklin, TN 37067
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-01-21
Status Date:
2013-12-13
Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.