Trademark search for:

PICGO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2003-10-01 — Application filed
2004-04-28 — Assigned to examiner
2004-04-30 — Final disposition recorded
2004-10-14 — Paper received
2004-10-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-10-28 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-10-29 — Data modification completed
2004-10-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-10-29 — Office action issued
2004-10-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-11-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2004-11-05 — Assigned to lie
2004-11-09 — Law office publication review completed
2005-02-16 — Notice of publication
2005-03-08 — Published for opposition
2005-05-31 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-10-31 — Teas statement of use received
2005-10-31 — Use amendment filed
2005-11-15 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2005-11-15 — Statement of use processing complete
2005-11-18 — Assigned to lie
2005-11-23 — Law office registration review completed
2006-01-10 — Registered-principal register
2007-07-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
2012-09-28 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2012-09-28 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Brantingham-Moyle Co.
Lebanon , MO

Brantingham-Moyle Co.
Lebanon , MO

Brantingham-Moyle Co.
Lebanon , MO

Correspondent

Carl M. Davis II Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
Six Concourse Parkway
Suite 3100
Atlanta, GA 30328

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-10-01

Status Date:
2012-09-28

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.