Trademark search for:

POWERAV

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2003-08-25 — Application filed
2004-03-10 — Assigned to examiner
2004-03-29 — Final disposition recorded
2004-10-01 — Paper received
2004-10-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-10-19 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-11-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-11-08 — Assigned to lie
2004-11-08 — Law office publication review completed
2004-12-22 — Notice of publication
2005-01-11 — Published for opposition
2005-04-05 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-07-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-09-28 — Sou teas extension received
2005-09-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-10-28 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-03-28 — Sou teas extension received
2006-03-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-03-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-09-29 — Sou teas extension received
2006-09-29 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-09-29 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-03-28 — Sou teas extension received
2007-03-28 — Sou extension 4 granted
2007-03-28 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-10-04 — Sou teas extension received
2007-10-04 — Sou extension 5 filed
2007-10-04 — Sou extension 5 granted
2008-04-07 — Final status recorded
2008-06-10 — Application abandoned
2008-06-10 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

Intellon Corporation
Ocala , FL

Intellon Corporation
Ocala , FL

Correspondent

Amy L. Brosius Fish & Richardson P.C.
P.O. Box 1022
Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-08-25

Status Date:
2008-04-07

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.