Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
SP ›
SPIDERVISION
Trademark search for:
SPIDERVISION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-07-05 — Application filed
2007-07-09 — Application filed
2007-07-10 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2007-09-25 — Assigned to examiner
2007-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
2007-09-27 — Final disposition recorded
2007-12-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-12-13 — Office action issued
2007-12-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-12-17 — Suspension letter written
2007-12-18 — Letter of suspension mailed
2008-06-18 — Suspension inquiry written
2008-06-18 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2008-06-18 — Assigned to lie
2008-06-18 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2008-07-02 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2008-07-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-07-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-07-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-07-08 — Assigned to lie
2008-07-09 — Law office publication review completed
2008-07-23 — Notice of publication
2008-08-12 — Published for opposition
2008-10-28 — Registered-principal register
2014-11-26 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2015-05-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2015-05-29 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PULSION MEDICAL SYSTEMS AG
Munich DE
PULSION MEDICAL SYSTEMS AG
Munich DE
PULSION MEDICAL SYSTEMS AG
Munich DE
Correspondent
STEWART J. BELLUS COLLARD & ROE, P.C. 1077 NORTHERN BLVD ROSLYN, NY 11576-1614 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-07-05
Status Date:
2015-05-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.