Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SUPRAPLUS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2003-11-26 — Application filed
  • 2003-12-24 — Application filed
  • 2004-04-21 — Teas amendment of use received
  • 2004-04-21 — Use amendment filed
  • 2004-04-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-04-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-06-07 — Amendment to use processing complete
  • 2004-06-27 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-06-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2004-07-09 — Office action issued
  • 2004-07-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-07-09 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2004-07-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-07-09 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2004-07-21 — Use amendment accepted
  • 2004-07-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2004-09-01 — Notice of publication
  • 2004-09-21 — Published for opposition
  • 2004-12-14 — Registered-principal register
  • 2010-11-29 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
  • 2010-12-15 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2010-12-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2015-05-21 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
  • 2015-06-11 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2015-06-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
  • 2015-06-11 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
  • 2015-06-11 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
  • 2018-04-28 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2018-04-28 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2018-08-08 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2020-03-06 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2020-03-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2020-03-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2020-03-06 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2020-03-06 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2020-03-06 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2020-05-13 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2020-05-13 — Review of correspondence complete - information made of record
  • 2021-02-04 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2021-02-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-02-04 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
  • 2021-02-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-02-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2021-02-04 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2021-06-22 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2021-06-22 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2021-06-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2022-11-02 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2023-04-20 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2023-04-20 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2023-04-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2023-04-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2023-04-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2023-12-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2025-06-27 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2025-06-27 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Plantronics, Inc.
Santa Cruz , CA
Plantronics, Inc.
Santa Cruz , CA
Plantronics, Inc.
Santa Cruz , CA

Correspondent

Randall J. Collins Plantronics, Inc.
345 Encinal Street
Legal Department
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2003-11-26
Status Date:
2025-06-27
Filing Year:
2003

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.