Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
WO ›
WORK STYLE INNOVATION
Trademark search for:
WORK STYLE INNOVATION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-01-29 — Application filed
2003-02-20 — Paper received
2003-02-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-07-18 — Assigned to examiner
2003-07-22 — Final disposition recorded
2003-07-30 — Case file in ticrs
2004-01-21 — Paper received
2004-01-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-03-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-05-12 — Notice of publication
2004-06-01 — Published for opposition
2004-08-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2004-09-23 — Fax received
2005-02-14 — Paper received
2005-02-14 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-03-23 — Sou extension 1 granted
2005-07-22 — Sou teas extension received
2005-07-22 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-07-22 — Sou extension 2 granted
2006-02-15 — Sou teas extension received
2006-02-15 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-02-15 — Sou extension 3 granted
2006-08-07 — Sou teas extension received
2006-08-07 — Sou extension 4 filed
2006-08-07 — Sou extension 4 granted
2007-02-21 — Sou teas extension received
2007-02-21 — Sou extension 5 filed
2007-02-21 — Sou extension 5 granted
2007-08-25 — Final status recorded
2007-12-07 — Application abandoned
2007-12-07 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Brother Industries, Ltd.
Nagoya, 467-0841 JP
Brother Industries, Ltd.
Nagoya, 467-0841 JP
Correspondent
JAMES A OLIFF OLIFF & BERRIDGE, PLC PO BOX 19928 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-01-29
Status Date:
2007-08-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.