Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2003 ›
WR ›
WRISTCOM
Trademark search for:
WRISTCOM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-01-02 — Application filed
2003-06-15 — Assigned to examiner
2003-06-29 — Final disposition recorded
2003-07-25 — Paper received
2003-07-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-11-21 — Examiners amendment mailed
2003-11-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-01-12 — Paper received
2004-04-21 — Notice of publication
2004-05-11 — Published for opposition
2004-05-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-08-03 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-02-01 — Sou teas extension received
2005-02-01 — Sou extension 1 filed
2005-02-01 — Sou extension 1 granted
2005-02-23 — Paper received
2005-03-24 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2005-08-03 — Sou teas extension received
2005-08-03 — Sou extension 2 filed
2005-08-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
2005-12-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-02-03 — Sou teas extension received
2006-02-03 — Sou extension 3 filed
2006-02-24 — Sou extension 3 granted
2006-07-27 — Sou teas extension received
2006-07-27 — Sou extension 4 filed
2007-01-31 — Sou extension 4 granted
2007-02-04 — Final status recorded
2007-04-19 — Application abandoned
2007-04-19 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Spectrum Research
Sarasota , FL
Spectrum Research
Sarasota , FL
Correspondent
ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD, KRASS, GROTH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSO PO BOX 7021 TROY, MI 48007-7021 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-01-02
Status Date:
2007-02-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.