Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ALL-IN HOLD'EM POKER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-01-13 — Application filed
  • 2004-01-22 — Application filed
  • 2004-05-12 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
  • 2004-05-12 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2004-05-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-08-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-08-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-01-26 — Office action issued
  • 2005-01-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-02-03 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-02-09 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-02-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2005-02-16 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-08-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-02-15 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-03-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-09-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2006-09-22 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-09-22 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-03-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-08-13 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-08-13 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-09-28 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-09-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2007-10-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-10-15 — Office action issued
  • 2007-10-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-10-31 — Office action issued
  • 2007-10-31 — Office action issued
  • 2007-10-31 — Office action issued
  • 2007-11-26 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2007-11-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-11-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-12-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-12-04 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-12-19 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-01-08 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-04-01 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2008-05-15 — Amendment after noa not entered
  • 2008-05-15 — Paper received
  • 2008-05-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2008-05-15 — Divisional request received
  • 2008-05-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2008-05-21 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2009-03-02 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-03-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2009-03-02 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2009-08-31 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-08-31 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2009-09-21 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-09-21 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2010-03-04 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2010-03-04 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2010-03-12 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-03-12 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2010-03-15 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-03-15 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2010-09-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-09-14 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-09-14 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2010-09-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2010-09-23 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2010-09-24 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-05-02 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-05-02 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-05-02 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Sklansky Games LLC
Minnetonka , MN
Sklansky Games LLC
Minnetonka , MN

Correspondent

Bradley Berman Sklansky Games LLC
10275 Wayzata Blvd.
Suite 100
Minnetonka, MN 55305

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-01-13
Status Date:
2011-05-02
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.