Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CERTIDO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-08-26 — Application filed
  • 2004-09-03 — Application filed
  • 2005-01-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-08-22 — Paper received
  • 2005-08-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-09-01 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-09-22 — Office action issued
  • 2005-09-22 — Office action issued
  • 2006-02-15 — Paper received
  • 2006-02-23 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2006-03-24 — Paper received
  • 2006-03-24 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-03-31 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-04-21 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-04-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-08-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-10-21 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-12-04 — Paper received
  • 2007-01-06 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2007-01-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-01-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-01-06 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-01-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2007-01-06 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2007-01-06 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-01-06 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-01-08 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2007-01-19 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-01-29 — Fax received
  • 2007-01-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-01-30 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-01-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2007-01-30 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2007-01-30 — Withdrawn from pub - examining attorney request
  • 2007-01-31 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-02-28 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-03-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-06-12 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2007-11-28 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2007-11-28 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2007-11-28 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2008-06-11 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-06-11 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2008-06-11 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2008-12-10 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-12-10 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2008-12-10 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2009-06-09 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-06-09 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2009-07-01 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-07-01 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2009-12-10 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-12-10 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2009-12-15 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2010-06-12 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-06-14 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-06-16 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2010-06-21 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-07-19 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-07-31 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-07-31 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-08-03 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use mailed
  • 2010-09-07 — Registered-principal register
  • 2017-04-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-04-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

KEANE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
BOSTON , MA
KEANE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
BOSTON , MA
Caritor, Inc.
San Ramon , CA
Caritor, Inc.
San Ramon , CA

Correspondent

Harold V Stotland SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Suite 2400
131 S. Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60603

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-08-26
Status Date:
2017-04-14
Category:
Electronics & Software
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.