Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2004 ›
DI ›
DIGITAL CONCIERGE
Trademark search for:
DIGITAL CONCIERGE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2017-01-09 — Application filed
2017-01-12 — Application filed
2017-01-17 — Application filed
2017-03-31 — Assigned to examiner
2017-04-24 — Final disposition recorded
2017-04-24 — Final disposition recorded
2017-04-24 — Final disposition recorded
2017-08-08 — Office action issued
2017-08-28 — Assigned to lie
2017-08-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-08-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-10-23 — Office action issued
2017-10-23 — Office action issued
2017-10-23 — Office action issued
2017-11-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-01-19 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-01-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-01-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-01-24 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2018-01-24 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2018-02-09 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2018-02-20 — Law office publication review completed
2018-03-27 — Registered-supplemental register
2023-03-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2024-10-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2024-10-11 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Volume Limited
Wokingham, Berkshire GB
Volume Limited
Wokingham, Berkshire GB
Correspondent
AMY A. ROLLINS Brannon Sowers & Cracraft PC 47 South Meridian Street, Suite 400 Indianapolis, IN 46204 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2017-01-09
Status Date:
2024-10-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.