Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2004 ›
EN ›
ENTERPRISEXP
Trademark search for:
ENTERPRISEXP
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-03-09 — Application filed
2004-03-23 — Application filed
2004-04-12 — Paper received
2004-09-22 — Assigned to examiner
2004-09-30 — Final disposition recorded
2004-10-01 — Final disposition recorded
2005-03-23 — Paper received
2005-03-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-04-06 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-05-05 — Suspension letter written
2005-05-05 — Letter of suspension mailed
2005-11-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-05-12 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2006-06-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-12-11 — Assigned to lie
2006-12-11 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2007-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
2007-02-26 — Final disposition recorded
2007-08-27 — Office action issued
2007-08-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-08-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-09-26 — Office action issued
2007-09-26 — Office action issued
2007-09-26 — Office action issued
2008-04-23 — Application abandoned
2008-04-23 — Application abandoned
2008-04-23 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Dynamic Systems Development Method Limited
Ashford, Kent TN24 OHB GB
Correspondent
SUSAN NEUBERGER WELLER ESQ MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY & 701 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20004 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-03-09
Status Date:
2008-04-23
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.