Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2004 ›
IT ›
IT-JAIL
Trademark search for:
IT-JAIL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-07-16 — Application filed
2004-07-27 — Application filed
2005-02-18 — Assigned to examiner
2005-02-22 — Final disposition recorded
2005-02-23 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-22 — Paper received
2005-08-25 — Paper received
2005-08-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-09-07 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-09-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-09-09 — Assigned to lie
2005-10-14 — Law office publication review completed
2005-11-16 — Notice of publication
2005-12-06 — Published for opposition
2006-02-28 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-08-25 — Sou teas extension received
2006-08-25 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-09-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-02-28 — Sou teas extension received
2007-02-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-02-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-08-28 — Sou teas extension received
2007-08-28 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-09-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-10-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-10-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-02-29 — Final status recorded
2008-04-30 — Application abandoned
2008-04-30 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Evercom Systems, Inc.
Dallas , TX
Evercom Systems, Inc.
Irving , TX
Correspondent
Michael J. Fogarty III Slater & Matsil, L.L.P. 17950 Preston Road Suite 1000 Dallas, TX 75252
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-07-16
Status Date:
2008-02-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.