Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2004 ›
MO ›
MOBILITY UNLIMITED
Trademark search for:
MOBILITY UNLIMITED
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-06-04 — Application filed
2004-06-11 — Application filed
2005-01-06 — Final disposition recorded
2005-01-06 — Assigned to examiner
2005-01-07 — Final disposition recorded
2005-07-01 — Office action issued
2005-07-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-07-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-07-28 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-07-28 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-07-29 — Examiners amendment mailed
2005-07-29 — Assigned to lie
2005-08-04 — Law office publication review completed
2005-09-07 — Notice of publication
2005-09-27 — Published for opposition
2005-12-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-06-19 — Sou teas extension received
2006-06-19 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-06-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-12-20 — Sou teas extension received
2006-12-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-12-20 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-01-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-06-07 — Sou teas extension received
2007-06-07 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-06-07 — Sou extension 3 granted
2007-12-21 — Final status recorded
2008-02-22 — Application abandoned
2008-02-22 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
INTELLISYNC CORPORATION
San Jose , CA
INTELLISYNC CORPORATION
San Jose , CA
Correspondent
Martin R. Greenstein TechMark a Law Corporation 4820 Harwood Road, 2nd Floor San Jose, CA 95124-5273 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-06-04
Status Date:
2007-12-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.