Trademark search for:

NAPSTER LIGHT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2004-05-07 — Application filed
2004-05-14 — Application filed
2004-07-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
2004-12-07 — Assigned to examiner
2004-12-08 — Examiners amendment -written
2004-12-08 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2004-12-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
2004-12-12 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-12-21 — Assigned to lie
2005-01-05 — Law office publication review completed
2005-03-09 — Notice of publication
2005-03-29 — Published for opposition
2005-04-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-04-26 — Opposition papers received at ttab
2005-04-27 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2012-02-10 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2012-02-10 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2012-05-30 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2012-06-06 — Ttab release case to trademarks
2012-06-06 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
2012-06-06 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
2012-07-17 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-02-18 — Application abandoned
2013-02-18 — Final status recorded
2013-02-19 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

RHAPSODY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SEATTLE , WA

Napster, LLC
Santa Clara , CA

Napster, LLC
Santa Clara , CA

Correspondent

MICHAEL T ZELLER QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP
865 S FIGUEROA ST
10TH FLOOR
LOS ANGELES, CA 90017

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-05-07

Status Date:
2013-02-18

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.