Brandinium

Trademark search for:

TRUE CERAMIC PRO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-04-09 — Application filed
  • 2004-04-21 — Application filed
  • 2004-04-26 — Teas voluntary amendment received
  • 2004-11-01 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2004-11-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-01-31 — Paper received
  • 2005-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-05-03 — Office action issued
  • 2005-05-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-05-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-05-11 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-05-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2005-05-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-10-12 — Office action issued
  • 2005-10-12 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-10-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2005-11-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-11-18 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-11-22 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2005-12-21 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-01-10 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-02-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-02-07 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-04-04 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2006-05-03 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2006-05-17 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
  • 2006-06-21 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2006-10-04 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2006-11-04 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2006-12-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-12-06 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-02-16 — Use amendment filed
  • 2007-02-16 — Paper received
  • 2007-02-16 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2007-02-16 — Divisional request received
  • 2007-04-04 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2007-04-05 — Paper received
  • 2007-04-09 — Paper received
  • 2007-05-04 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2007-05-17 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
  • 2007-05-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-05-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-06-05 — Fax received
  • 2007-06-05 — Communication received from petitioner
  • 2007-06-25 — Petition granted - extension request filed
  • 2007-10-11 — Paper received
  • 2007-10-29 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2007-10-30 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2007-12-12 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-01-24 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-02-12 — Fax received
  • 2008-02-18 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2008-02-26 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2008-04-11 — Reinstatement granted - sou filed
  • 2008-04-18 — Notice of reinstatement mailed
  • 2008-05-06 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2008-05-27 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2008-05-27 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2008-05-27 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-05-27 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-05-27 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-05-27 — Su-examiner's amendment written
  • 2008-05-27 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-07-01 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-08-15 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2015-02-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2015-02-06 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ADVANCED BEAUTY SOLUTIONS, LLC
IRVINE , CA
CIRTRAN CORPORATION
SALT LAKE CITY , UT
CIRTRAN CORPORATION
SALT LAKE CITY , UT
ADVANCED BEAUTY SOLUTIONS, LLC
LOS ANGELES , CA
ADVANCED BEAUTY SOLUTIONS, LLC
LOS ANGELES , CA
Pure Beauty, Inc.
Encino , CA

Correspondent

Todd E. Zenger Kirton & McConkie
60 East South Temple
1800 Eagle Gate Tower
Salt Lake City, UT 84111

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-04-09
Status Date:
2015-02-06
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.