Brandinium

Trademark search for:

VITELCOM MOBILE TECHNOLOGY S.A.

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-08-31 — Application filed
  • 2005-12-01 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2005-12-02 — Application filed
  • 2005-12-02 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-12-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-12-10 — Office action issued
  • 2005-12-12 — Office action issued
  • 2005-12-31 — Office action issued
  • 2006-06-12 — Fax received
  • 2006-06-16 — Paper received
  • 2006-06-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-07-08 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-07-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-07-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-07-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-07-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-08-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-08-11 — Office action issued
  • 2006-08-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-08-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-09-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-09-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-09-21 — Office action issued
  • 2006-09-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-09-25 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-09-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-09-29 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-10-02 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-11-04 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2006-11-20 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-01-08 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2007-01-08 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-01-08 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-01-24 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2007-01-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-01-24 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-01-24 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2007-02-28 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-02-28 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-03-26 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2007-04-08 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2007-05-03 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2007-05-03 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2007-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-05-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-05-17 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2007-12-14 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2007-12-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-12-14 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-12-14 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-12-14 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2007-12-17 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-01-02 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-01-22 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-03-16 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-04-08 — Registered-principal register
  • 2008-07-08 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-04-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2014-01-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2014-01-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2014-08-31 — Final status recorded
  • 2014-11-26 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2015-03-27 — Death of international registration
  • 2015-03-27 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

VITELCOM MOBILE TECHNOLOGY, S.A.
ES
VITELCOM MOBILE TECHNOLOGY, S.A.
ES
VITELCOM MOBILE TECHNOLOGY, S.A.
ES

Correspondent

REBECCAH GAN YOUNG & THOMPSON
209 Madison St., Ste. 500
Alexandria, VA 22314
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-08-31
Status Date:
2014-08-31
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.