Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
BB ›
B3SMART
Trademark search for:
B3SMART
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-12-13 — Application filed
2005-12-20 — Application filed
2005-12-24 — Application filed
2006-06-13 — Assigned to examiner
2006-06-23 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-06-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-06-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-06-23 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2006-06-30 — Assigned to lie
2006-06-30 — Law office publication review completed
2006-08-02 — Notice of publication
2006-08-22 — Published for opposition
2006-11-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-03-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-03-29 — Paper received
2007-07-19 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-11-01 — Paper received
2007-11-01 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-11-21 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-04-04 — Paper received
2008-04-04 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-04-17 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-08-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-09-09 — Paper received
2008-09-09 — Sou extension 4 filed
2008-09-18 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-09-18 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-09-29 — Assigned to examiner
2009-06-15 — Application abandoned
2009-06-15 — Application abandoned
2009-06-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
MACNICA, INC.
Kanagawa Prefecture 222-8561 JP
MACNICA, INC.
Kanagawa Prefecture 222-8561 JP
Correspondent
THOMAS E. SCHATZEL LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS E. SCHATZEL 50 W. San Fernando Street, Suite 1300 San Jose, CA 95113 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-12-13
Status Date:
2009-06-15
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.