Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
BE ›
BEOMAP
Trademark search for:
BEOMAP
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-01-25 — Application filed
2005-02-03 — Application filed
2005-08-23 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-24 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-24 — Final disposition recorded
2006-03-09 — Office action issued
2006-03-09 — Petition to revive-granted
2006-03-09 — Teas petition to revive received
2006-03-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-03-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-05-23 — Office action issued
2006-05-23 — Office action issued
2006-12-29 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-12-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-12-29 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-12-29 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-02-01 — Assigned to lie
2007-02-01 — Law office publication review completed
2007-02-23 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2007-03-05 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2007-03-31 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-31 — Office action issued
2007-06-12 — Assigned to examiner
2007-11-13 — Application abandoned
2007-11-13 — Final status recorded
2007-11-14 — Application abandoned
2008-06-11 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2008-07-09 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
Owner Information
Scyld Computing Corporation
San Francisco , CA
Correspondent
ROBERT B BURLINGAME CALENDAR/DOCKETING DEPT PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP PO BOX 7880 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-01-25
Status Date:
2007-11-13
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.