Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CONVERGED SERVICES NODE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-07-16 — Application filed
  • 2005-07-21 — Application filed
  • 2005-10-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-02-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-02-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-02-11 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-08-11 — Paper received
  • 2006-08-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-08-22 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-10-11 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-10-11 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-04-27 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2007-04-27 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-04-27 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-04-27 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2007-06-27 — Office action issued
  • 2007-07-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-07-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-08-08 — Suspension letter written
  • 2007-08-08 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-08-08 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-02-14 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-03-06 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-03-06 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-03-06 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-03-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2008-04-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-04-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-04-24 — Suspension letter written
  • 2008-04-24 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-04-24 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-10-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2008-11-17 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2008-11-17 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2008-11-17 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-04-13 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2009-04-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-04-15 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-05-04 — Suspension letter written
  • 2009-05-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-05-04 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2009-10-07 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-10-14 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
  • 2009-12-14 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2010-01-04 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2010-01-04 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-01-04 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-07-05 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
  • 2010-07-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-07-07 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-07-26 — Suspension letter written
  • 2010-07-26 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2010-07-26 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-01-27 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2011-02-01 — Suspension inquiry written
  • 2011-02-01 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-02-01 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
  • 2011-07-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2011-07-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-08-30 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-08-30 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-08-30 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

1553804 ONTARIO INC.
WOODBRIDGE, ONTARIO CA
1553804 ONTARIO INC.
WOODBRIDGE, ONTARIO CA
NewStep Networks Inc.
Toronto, Ontario CA

Correspondent

Michael G. Crilly, Esquire Law Offices of Michael Crilly
104 South York Road
Hatboro, PA 19040
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-07-16
Status Date:
2011-08-30
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.