Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
CO ›
CONZERV
Trademark search for:
CONZERV
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-10-14 — Application filed
2006-06-08 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2006-06-09 — Application filed
2006-06-09 — Assigned to examiner
2006-06-10 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-11 — Office action issued
2006-06-13 — Office action issued
2006-06-13 — Office action issued
2006-06-29 — Office action issued
2006-12-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-12-11 — Office action issued
2006-12-11 — Office action issued
2006-12-11 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-12-12 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-01-10 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-10 — Final disposition recorded
2007-05-03 — Correction transaction received from ib
2007-07-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-07-06 — Office action issued
2007-07-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-08-07 — Office action issued
2007-08-07 — Office action issued
2007-08-07 — Office action issued
2008-01-25 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2008-01-25 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2008-01-25 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2008-01-25 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2008-02-22 — Final disposition recorded
2008-02-22 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2008-02-22 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2008-02-23 — Final disposition recorded
2008-02-23 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2008-02-23 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2008-03-07 — Correction transaction received from ib
2008-03-13 — Correction from ib entered - no review required
2008-03-24 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2008-03-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-03-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-04-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-04-19 — Assigned to lie
2008-04-21 — Law office publication review completed
2008-05-05 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2008-06-03 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2008-06-06 — Final disposition recorded
2008-06-06 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2008-06-06 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2008-07-03 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2008-07-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-07-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-07-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-08-11 — Law office publication review completed
2008-08-27 — Notice of publication
2008-09-16 — Published for opposition
2008-12-02 — Exparte appeal terminated
2008-12-02 — Registered-principal register
2009-03-02 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-03-19 — Final disposition recorded
2009-09-04 — Correction transaction received from ib
2009-09-10 — Correction from the ib examined, no action is needed
2013-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
2014-11-07 — New representative at ib received
2015-07-03 — Cancelled section 71
2015-10-14 — Final status recorded
2016-03-03 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2016-04-25 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2016-04-25 — Invalidation processed
2016-05-13 — Death of international registration
2016-05-13 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg mailed
2017-04-07 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
Owner Information
Terramark Markencreation GmbH
DE
Terramark Markencreation GmbH
DE
Terramark Markencreation GmbH
DE
Correspondent
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB 666 3RD AVE 10TH FL NEW YORK, NY 10017 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-10-14
Status Date:
2015-10-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.