Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
EL ›
ELOFLOW
Trademark search for:
ELOFLOW
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-06-23 — Application filed
2005-06-28 — Application filed
2006-01-13 — Assigned to examiner
2006-01-23 — Final disposition recorded
2006-01-23 — Final disposition recorded
2006-04-24 — Paper received
2006-04-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-05-17 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-06-27 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-06-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-06-27 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-06-27 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-07-03 — Assigned to lie
2006-07-03 — Law office publication review completed
2006-08-02 — Notice of publication
2006-08-22 — Published for opposition
2006-11-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-05-14 — Teas statement of use received
2007-05-14 — Use amendment filed
2007-07-06 — Fax received
2007-07-27 — Statement of use processing complete
2007-08-17 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2007-08-17 — Assigned to examiner
2007-09-21 — Law office registration review completed
2007-09-21 — Assigned to lie
2007-10-30 — Registered-principal register
2014-06-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2014-06-06 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
ELODRIVE GMBH
Minden DE
ELODRIVE GMBH
Minden DE
ELODRIVE GMBH
Minden DE
Correspondent
MICHAEL J. STRIKER STRIKER, STRIKER & STENBY 103 EAST NECK ROAD HUNTINGTON, NY 11743-1567 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-06-23
Status Date:
2014-06-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.