Brandinium

Trademark search for:

EMERGENT TECHNOLOGIES

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-06-10 — Application filed
  • 2005-06-16 — Application filed
  • 2005-12-30 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-01-05 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-05-30 — Office action issued
  • 2006-05-30 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-06-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-07-09 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-07-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2007-01-25 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-01-25 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-08-16 — Office action issued
  • 2007-08-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-08-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-10-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-10-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-10-02 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-04-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-04-02 — Office action issued
  • 2008-04-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-08-27 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-27 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-27 — Office action issued
  • 2009-02-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-02-24 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2009-02-24 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2009-02-24 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2009-02-24 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2009-02-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-02-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-02-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-03-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-04-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-04-16 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2009-04-16 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
  • 2009-05-28 — Teas amendment of use received
  • 2009-05-28 — Use amendment filed
  • 2009-05-29 — Amendment to use processing complete
  • 2009-05-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-05-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-05-31 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
  • 2009-06-01 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2009-06-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-06-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-06-03 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-06-03 — Approved for registration supplemental register
  • 2009-06-03 — Use amendment accepted
  • 2009-06-03 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-06-03 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-06-03 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-06-04 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-06-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-07-07 — Registered-supplemental register
  • 2014-11-21 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2014-11-21 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2015-07-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-07-02 — Teas section 8 received
  • 2015-08-05 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2015-08-06 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
  • 2015-08-06 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
  • 2018-07-07 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
  • 2020-02-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2020-02-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

2028505 ONTARIO INC.
Mississauga, Ontario CA
2028505 ONTARIO INC.
TORONTO CA

Correspondent

Sandra M. Koenig FAY SHARPE LLP
1228 Euclid Avenue, 5th Floor
Cleveland, OH 44115
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-06-10
Status Date:
2020-02-14
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.