Trademark search for:

INOVOMETRIX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2005-01-26 — Application filed
2005-02-03 — Application filed
2005-08-24 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-31 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-08-31 — Examiner's amendment entered
2005-09-01 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2005-09-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-09-09 — Assigned to lie
2005-09-15 — Law office publication review completed
2005-10-12 — Notice of publication
2005-11-01 — Published for opposition
2006-01-24 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-03-03 — Sou teas extension received
2006-03-03 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-03-03 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-11-28 — Sou teas extension received
2006-11-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
2006-11-28 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-02-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-02-16 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-02-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-02-16 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-03-07 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-06-15 — Sou teas extension received
2007-06-15 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-06-15 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-01-25 — Final status recorded
2008-03-26 — Application abandoned
2008-03-26 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

Embrex, Inc.
Durham , NC

Embrex, Inc.
Durham , NC

Correspondent

F MICHAEL SAJOVEC MYERS BIGEL SIBLEY & SAJOVEC
PO BOX 37428
RALEIGH, NC 27627-7428
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-01-26

Status Date:
2008-01-25

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.