Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
IP ›
IP CORRELYTICS
Trademark search for:
IP CORRELYTICS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-05-27 — Application filed
2005-06-06 — Application filed
2005-12-20 — Assigned to examiner
2005-12-27 — Final disposition recorded
2005-12-27 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-05 — Office action issued
2006-06-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-06-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-08-02 — Office action issued
2006-08-02 — Office action issued
2007-01-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-01-31 — Office action issued
2007-01-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-02-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-03-14 — Assigned to lie
2007-03-14 — Law office publication review completed
2007-04-18 — Notice of publication
2007-05-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-05-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-05-08 — Published for opposition
2007-06-12 — Teas change of owner address received
2007-06-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2007-07-31 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-02-01 — Final status recorded
2008-04-02 — Application abandoned
2008-04-02 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Primal Solutions, Inc.
Irvine , CA
Primal Solutions, Inc.
Irvine , CA
Correspondent
Curtis A. Vock LATHROP & GAGE L.C. 4845 Pearl East Circle, Suite 300 Boulder, CO 80301 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-05-27
Status Date:
2008-02-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.