Brandinium

Trademark search for:

KAPPA MIKEY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-01-26 — Application filed
  • 2005-02-04 — Application filed
  • 2005-03-04 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-03-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-03-07 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-03-08 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2005-04-19 — Paper received
  • 2005-04-19 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-04-26 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-05-03 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-05-12 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-10-31 — Office action issued
  • 2005-10-31 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-11-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2005-11-26 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2005-11-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2005-11-28 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2005-12-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-12-08 — Assigned to lie
  • 2005-12-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-01-03 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2006-01-30 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2006-02-02 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2006-02-02 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2006-02-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2006-02-03 — Assigned to lie
  • 2006-02-13 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2006-03-08 — Notice of publication
  • 2006-03-28 — Published for opposition
  • 2006-04-17 — Extension of time to oppose received
  • 2006-06-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-08-01 — Opposition papers received at ttab
  • 2006-08-11 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
  • 2006-08-25 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
  • 2008-04-08 — Ttab release case to trademarks
  • 2008-04-08 — Opposition dismissed no. 999999
  • 2008-04-08 — Opposition terminated no. 999999
  • 2008-05-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2008-11-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-11-20 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-11-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2008-11-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2008-11-25 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2008-11-25 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2009-05-20 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-05-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2009-05-21 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2009-11-19 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-11-19 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2009-11-23 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2010-05-12 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2010-05-12 — Use amendment filed
  • 2010-05-14 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2010-06-04 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2010-06-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-06-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2010-06-04 — Office action issued
  • 2010-06-04 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2010-06-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-06-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-06-19 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2010-06-19 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-06-22 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2010-07-27 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-12-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-07-27 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2017-03-03 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2017-03-03 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Kanonen & Bestreichen
New York , NY
Kanonen & Bestreichen
New York , NY
Kanonen & Bestreichen
New York , NY

Correspondent

Howard F Mandelbaum Levine Mandelbaum PLLC
222 Bloomingdale Road
Suite 203
White Plains, NY 10605

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-01-26
Status Date:
2017-03-03
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.