Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
LA ›
LAYBY.COM
Trademark search for:
LAYBY.COM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-12-02 — Application filed
2005-12-08 — Application filed
2005-12-09 — Notice of design search code mailed
2006-06-05 — Assigned to examiner
2006-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-19 — Final disposition recorded
2006-12-18 — Office action issued
2006-12-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-12-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-12-29 — Final disposition recorded
2006-12-29 — Final disposition recorded
2007-06-21 — Fax received
2007-06-30 — Amendment from applicant entered
2007-06-30 — Assigned to lie
2007-06-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-07-12 — Assigned to examiner
2007-07-20 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
2007-07-20 — Notification of examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2007-07-20 — Examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
2007-10-05 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-10-05 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2008-01-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-01-22 — Office action issued
2008-01-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-02-15 — Office action issued
2008-02-15 — Office action issued
2008-02-15 — Office action issued
2008-09-25 — Application abandoned
2008-09-25 — Application abandoned
2008-09-25 — Final status recorded
Correspondent
John W. Peck Kauth, Pomeroy, Peck & Bailey LLP P.O. Box 19152 Irvine, CA 92623 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-12-02
Status Date:
2008-09-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.