Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
OA ›
OAKLEY PARIS
Trademark search for:
OAKLEY PARIS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-04-11 — Application filed
2005-04-18 — Application filed
2005-11-08 — Assigned to examiner
2005-11-14 — Examiners amendment -written
2005-11-14 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-11-14 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2005-11-18 — Assigned to lie
2005-11-21 — Law office publication review completed
2005-12-21 — Notice of publication
2006-01-10 — Published for opposition
2006-04-04 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-09-29 — Sou teas extension received
2006-09-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-09-29 — Sou extension 1 granted
2007-04-02 — Sou teas extension received
2007-04-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
2007-04-02 — Sou extension 2 granted
2007-09-26 — Sou teas extension received
2007-09-26 — Sou extension 3 filed
2007-09-26 — Sou extension 3 granted
2008-04-02 — Sou teas extension received
2008-04-02 — Sou extension 4 granted
2008-04-02 — Sou extension 4 filed
2008-10-03 — Sou teas extension received
2008-10-03 — Sou extension 5 filed
2008-10-03 — Sou extension 5 granted
2009-05-04 — Application abandoned
2009-05-04 — Application abandoned
2009-05-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Oakley, Inc.
Foothill Ranch , CA
Oakley, Inc.
Foothill Ranch , CA
Correspondent
Janet Robertson Kaufman WEEKS, KAUFMAN,NELSON & JOHNSON 462 STEVENS AVE STE 310 SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075-2066 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-04-11
Status Date:
2009-05-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.