Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PICO DROPPER

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-09-27 — Application filed
  • 2005-11-17 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2005-11-18 — Application filed
  • 2005-12-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-12-14 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-12-15 — Office action issued
  • 2005-12-15 — Office action issued
  • 2005-12-16 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-12-17 — Office action issued
  • 2005-12-21 — Office action issued
  • 2006-01-19 — Office action issued
  • 2006-02-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-02-09 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-06-14 — Office action issued
  • 2006-06-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-07-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-08-01 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-08-02 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2007-02-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-02-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-04-19 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2007-04-19 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2007-05-03 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2007-09-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-03-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-03-06 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-09-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-03-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-09-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-03-11 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-09-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-03-14 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-09-14 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2011-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2011-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-04-16 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-04-16 — Application abandoned
  • 2012-06-14 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2012-06-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2012-06-14 — Office action issued
  • 2012-06-14 — Notice of revival - mailed
  • 2012-06-14 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2012-06-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2012-06-14 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2012-06-14 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2012-07-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2012-07-09 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2012-07-25 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2012-07-25 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2012-07-25 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2012-08-14 — Published for opposition
  • 2012-08-14 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2012-09-22 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2012-10-30 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2013-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2015-09-27 — Final status recorded
  • 2016-04-28 — Death of international registration
  • 2016-04-28 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

Proteros Biostructures GmbH
DE
Proteros Biostructures GmbH
DE
Proteros Biostructures GmbH
DE

Correspondent

Jay A. Bondell Ladas & Parry LLP
1040 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10018
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-09-27
Status Date:
2015-09-27
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.