Brandinium

Trademark search for:

PRISM SUITE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2005-04-19 — Application filed
  • 2005-04-27 — Application filed
  • 2005-11-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-11-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-11-17 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2006-06-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-06-26 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-07-27 — Petition to revive-granted
  • 2006-07-27 — Teas petition to revive received
  • 2006-08-02 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-08-02 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-08-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2006-08-28 — Office action issued
  • 2006-08-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-08-29 — Fax received
  • 2006-08-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-09-01 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2006-09-08 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-09-19 — Suspension letter written
  • 2006-09-19 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2006-09-22 — Office action issued
  • 2006-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-10-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-10-17 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-05-02 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-05-02 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2007-05-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-05-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-12-12 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2007-12-12 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-12-12 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-12-12 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-01-02 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-01-03 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-01-11 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2008-01-22 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2008-01-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-01-22 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-01-22 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-01-22 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2008-01-22 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2008-01-23 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-02-06 — Notice of publication
  • 2008-02-26 — Published for opposition
  • 2008-05-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2008-07-10 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2008-07-10 — Use amendment filed
  • 2008-07-21 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2008-07-21 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2008-07-31 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-31 — Office action issued
  • 2008-07-31 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-07-31 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-08-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-08-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-08-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2008-08-19 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2008-09-23 — Registered-principal register
  • 2011-03-23 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2012-01-03 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2015-04-24 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2015-04-24 — Final status recorded
  • 2016-02-18 — Teas change of owner address received
  • 2016-02-18 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered

Owner Information

New Boundary Technologies, INC
Minneapolis , MN
New Boundary Technologies, INC
Minneapolis , MN
New Boundary Technologies, INC
Minneapolis , MN

Correspondent

Jeremy Norton New Boundary Technologies, INC
10 2nd Street N.E.
Suite 107
Minneapolis, MN 55413

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2005-04-19
Status Date:
2015-04-24
Category:
Electronics & Software
Filing Year:
2005

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.