Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
SC ›
SCYLD BEOMASTER
Trademark search for:
SCYLD BEOMASTER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-01-31 — Application filed
2005-02-08 — Application filed
2005-08-15 — Assigned to examiner
2005-08-16 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-16 — Final disposition recorded
2006-03-09 — Office action issued
2006-03-09 — Petition to revive-granted
2006-03-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-03-09 — Teas petition to revive received
2006-03-15 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-03-23 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-03-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-03-23 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-03-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-03-31 — Assigned to lie
2006-04-25 — Law office publication review completed
2006-05-24 — Notice of publication
2006-06-13 — Published for opposition
2006-07-10 — Extension of time to oppose received
2006-09-22 — Opposition instituted no. 999999
2006-10-03 — Application abandoned
2006-10-03 — Application abandoned
2006-10-03 — Opposition sustained no. 999999
2006-10-03 — Final status recorded
2008-06-11 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2008-07-09 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
Owner Information
Scyld Computing Corporation
San Francisco , CA
Scyld Computing Corporation
San Francisco , CA
Correspondent
ROBERT B BURLINGAME CALENDAR/DOCKETING DEPT PO BO X 7880 PILLSBURY WINTHROP LLP SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94120-7880
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-01-31
Status Date:
2006-10-03
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.