Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
UP ›
UP-ARMOR
Trademark search for:
UP-ARMOR
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-06-24 — Application filed
2005-06-28 — Application filed
2006-01-17 — Final disposition recorded
2006-01-17 — Final disposition recorded
2006-01-17 — Assigned to examiner
2006-04-17 — Final disposition recorded
2006-04-17 — Final disposition recorded
2006-10-17 — Office action issued
2006-10-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-10-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-01-17 — Office action issued
2007-01-17 — Office action issued
2007-07-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-07-17 — Office action issued
2007-07-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-07-23 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2007-09-01 — Assigned to lie
2007-09-01 — Law office publication review completed
2007-10-09 — Registered-supplemental register
2012-11-08 — Teas section 8 received
2012-12-10 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-12-10 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2012-12-10 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2016-10-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-05-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2018-05-11 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Warwick Mills, Inc.
New Ipswich , NH
Warwick Mills, Inc.
New Ipswich , NH
Correspondent
Andrew P. Cernota Maine Cernota & Rardin 547 Amherst St, 3rd Fl. NASHUA, NH 03063 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-06-24
Status Date:
2018-05-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.