Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2005 ›
WO ›
WORKFLOW INNOVATION
Trademark search for:
WORKFLOW INNOVATION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-12-30 — Application filed
2006-01-05 — Application filed
2006-06-23 — Assigned to examiner
2006-06-28 — Final disposition recorded
2006-06-28 — Final disposition recorded
2006-08-08 — Paper received
2006-08-08 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-08-16 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-08-22 — Final disposition recorded
2006-08-22 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-11 — Paper received
2007-02-06 — Assigned to lie
2007-02-07 — Amendment from applicant entered
2007-02-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-02-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-02-08 — Law office publication review completed
2007-03-07 — Notice of publication
2007-03-27 — Published for opposition
2007-06-19 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-10-19 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2007-10-19 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2007-10-19 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-10-31 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2007-12-04 — Registered-principal register
2014-07-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2014-07-11 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
Tokyo JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
Tokyo JP
KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
Tokyo JP
Correspondent
Helen Hill Minsker Banner & Witcoff, Ltd. 1100 13th Street NW Suite 1200 Washington, DC 20005-4051
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-12-30
Status Date:
2014-07-11
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.