Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2006 ›
BL ›
BLENDING SESSIONS
Trademark search for:
BLENDING SESSIONS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-04-10 — Application filed
2006-04-14 — Application filed
2006-09-19 — Final disposition recorded
2006-09-19 — Assigned to examiner
2006-09-20 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-19 — Paper received
2007-03-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-04-20 — Amendment from applicant entered
2007-04-20 — Assigned to lie
2007-04-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-04-24 — Law office publication review completed
2007-06-06 — Notice of publication
2007-06-26 — Published for opposition
2007-09-18 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-03-07 — Sou teas extension received
2008-03-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-03-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-09-08 — Sou teas extension received
2008-09-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-09-12 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-09-12 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-03-12 — Sou teas extension received
2009-03-12 — Sou extension 3 filed
2009-03-13 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-09-18 — Sou teas extension received
2009-09-18 — Sou extension 4 filed
2009-09-22 — Sou extension 4 granted
2010-04-19 — Application abandoned
2010-04-19 — Application abandoned
2010-04-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
MOET HENNESSY USA, INC.
New York , NY
MOET HENNESSY USA, INC.
New York , NY
Correspondent
Nancy C. DiConza FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 866 UNITED NATIONS PLZ NEW YORK, NY 10017-1822 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-04-10
Status Date:
2010-04-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.