Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2006 ›
EU ›
EUPHONY
Trademark search for:
EUPHONY
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-05-08 — Application filed
2006-08-24 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2006-08-25 — Application filed
2006-10-10 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-13 — Final disposition recorded
2006-10-14 — Office action issued
2006-10-17 — Office action issued
2006-10-17 — Office action issued
2006-11-02 — Office action issued
2007-04-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-04-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-04-19 — Paper received
2007-05-14 — Amendment from applicant entered
2007-05-14 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2007-05-14 — Assigned to lie
2007-05-14 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-06-13 — Office action issued
2007-06-13 — Office action issued
2007-06-13 — Office action issued
2007-07-26 — New representative at ib received
2007-11-15 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
2007-11-30 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
2007-12-13 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2007-12-13 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2007-12-13 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2007-12-13 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2007-12-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-12-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-01-24 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2008-01-24 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2008-01-31 — Examiners amendment -written
2008-01-31 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-01-31 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-01-31 — Examiner's amendment entered
2008-02-04 — Examiners amendment -written
2008-02-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-02-04 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-02-04 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-02-04 — Examiner's amendment entered
2008-02-07 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2008-02-15 — Law office publication review completed
2008-02-21 — Change of owner received from ib
2008-03-03 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
2008-03-10 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2008-03-19 — Examiners amendment -written
2008-03-19 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-03-19 — Examiner's amendment entered
2008-03-20 — Examiners amendment mailed
2008-03-27 — Law office publication review completed
2008-04-09 — Notice of publication
2008-04-29 — Published for opposition
2008-07-15 — Exparte appeal terminated
2008-07-15 — Registered-principal register
2008-10-15 — Final disposition recorded
2008-10-29 — Final disposition recorded
2008-10-29 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-29 — Final disposition recorded
2014-07-14 — Teas section 71 & 15 received
2014-07-31 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2014-07-31 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 71 & 15 - e-mailed
2014-07-31 — Registered - partial sec. 71 accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2015-03-31 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection created
2015-07-17 — Partial invalidation of reg ext protection sent to ib
2015-07-17 — Invalidation processed
2015-08-07 — Partial invalidation processed by the ib
2016-01-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-05-08 — Final status recorded
2016-12-08 — Death of international registration
2016-12-08 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
DiMAGIC Co., Ltd.
Chiyoda-ku Tokyo JP
DiMAGIC Co., Ltd.
JP
DiMAGIC Co., Ltd.
JP
DIMAGIC CO., LTD.
Tokyo JP
Correspondent
Nicholas D. Wells Legends Law Group 330 N. Main St. Kaysville, UT 84037 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-05-08
Status Date:
2016-05-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.