Trademark search for:

IGNITING RICH MOBILE EXPERIENCES

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2006-10-23 — Application filed
2006-10-26 — Application filed
2007-03-06 — Assigned to examiner
2007-03-13 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-03-13 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-03-13 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-03-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-04-04 — Assigned to lie
2007-04-05 — Law office publication review completed
2007-05-16 — Notice of publication
2007-06-05 — Published for opposition
2007-07-04 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2007-08-28 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-02-27 — Sou teas extension received
2008-02-27 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-03-21 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-08-18 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-08-18 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2008-08-28 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-09-19 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2008-09-19 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-09-19 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-09-23 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-09-24 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-03-30 — Application abandoned
2009-03-30 — Application abandoned
2009-03-30 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

CATALYST MOBILE, INC.
EMERYVILLE , CA

Catalyst Mobile, LLC
Emeryville , CA

Catalyst Mobile, LLC
San Ramon , CA

Correspondent

Daniel J. O'Rourke
1149 Diamond Street
San Francisco, CA 94114
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-10-23

Status Date:
2009-03-30

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.