Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2006 ›
KI ›
KINEFORCE
Trademark search for:
KINEFORCE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-08-31 — Application filed
2006-09-07 — Application filed
2006-09-08 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2006-10-03 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2006-10-03 — Teas voluntary amendment received
2007-01-25 — Assigned to examiner
2007-02-01 — Final disposition recorded
2007-02-01 — Final disposition recorded
2007-04-05 — Office action issued
2007-05-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-05-03 — Assigned to lie
2007-05-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-05-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-05-09 — Law office publication review completed
2007-07-11 — Notice of publication
2007-07-31 — Published for opposition
2007-10-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-02-26 — Sou teas extension received
2008-02-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-02-26 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-10-08 — Sou teas extension received
2008-10-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-10-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-10-10 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-05-25 — Application abandoned
2009-05-25 — Final status recorded
2009-05-26 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Bethesda , MD
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Bethesda , MD
Correspondent
Jonathan Hudis Oblon, Spivak, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, P.C. 1940 DUKE ST ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314-3451 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-08-31
Status Date:
2009-05-25
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.