Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2006 ›
MI ›
MIND-ETCHING
Trademark search for:
MIND-ETCHING
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-02-17 — Application filed
2006-02-24 — Application filed
2006-08-08 — Final disposition recorded
2006-08-08 — Final disposition recorded
2006-08-08 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-23 — Office action issued
2006-10-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-10-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-11-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-12-06 — Assigned to lie
2006-12-06 — Law office publication review completed
2007-01-03 — Notice of publication
2007-01-23 — Published for opposition
2007-04-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-08-02 — Sou teas extension received
2007-08-02 — Sou extension 1 filed
2007-08-02 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-04-17 — Sou teas extension received
2008-04-17 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-04-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
2008-10-17 — Sou extension 3 filed
2008-10-22 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2008-10-22 — Petition to revive-granted
2008-10-22 — Teas petition to revive received
2008-10-23 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2008-10-23 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-05-18 — Application abandoned
2009-05-18 — Application abandoned
2009-05-18 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Halim, Kurniawan
Jakarta 10630 ID
Halim, Kurniawan
Jakarta 10630 ID
Correspondent
William C. Wright EPSTEIN DRANGEL BAZERMAN & JAMES, LLP 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 820 New York, NY 10165-0820 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-02-17
Status Date:
2009-05-18
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.