Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2006 ›
RE ›
RESPONDER RCI
Trademark search for:
RESPONDER RCI
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-01-05 — Application filed
2006-01-10 — Application filed
2006-06-26 — Assigned to examiner
2006-07-06 — Final disposition recorded
2006-07-06 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-08 — Office action issued
2007-02-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-02-01 — Assigned to lie
2007-02-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-03-30 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-30 — Final disposition recorded
2007-10-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-10-01 — Office action issued
2007-10-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-11-29 — Office action issued
2007-11-29 — Office action issued
2008-05-05 — Assigned to examiner
2008-05-29 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2008-05-29 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2008-05-29 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2008-05-29 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2008-05-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-05-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-09-10 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-10 — Final disposition recorded
2009-04-21 — Application abandoned
2009-04-21 — Application abandoned
2009-04-21 — Exparte appeal terminated
2009-04-21 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Smiths Detection Inc.
Danbury , CT
Correspondent
NORM J. RICH FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 3000 K STREET, N.W. SUITE 500 WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5143
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-01-05
Status Date:
2009-04-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.