Trademark search for:

SYMBILITY.NET

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2006-11-28 — Application filed
2006-12-01 — Application filed
2007-03-26 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-26 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-26 — Assigned to examiner
2007-08-27 — Suspension letter written
2007-08-27 — Correspondence e-mailed
2007-08-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-08-27 — Office action issued
2007-08-27 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-08-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-02-27 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-02-27 — Assigned to lie
2008-04-15 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2008-04-15 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-04-15 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-04-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-04-18 — Assigned to lie
2008-04-18 — Law office publication review completed
2008-05-07 — Notice of publication
2008-05-27 — Published for opposition
2008-08-12 — Registered-principal register
2012-05-14 — Teas change of owner address received
2012-05-14 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2015-03-13 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2015-03-13 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Symbility Solutions, inc.
Toronto, Ontario CA

Symbility Solutions, inc.
Kitchener CA

Symbility Solutions, inc.
Kitchener CA

Correspondent

ROBERT C LUKES GARLINGTON, LOHN & ROBINSON PLLP
199 W PINE ST
MISSOULA, MT 59802-4221
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-11-28

Status Date:
2015-03-13

Category:
Electronics & Software

Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.