Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Electronics & Software ›
2006 ›
TE ›
TENVI
Trademark search for:
TENVI
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-05-25 — Application filed
2006-06-01 — Application filed
2006-10-26 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-27 — Final disposition recorded
2006-10-30 — Final disposition recorded
2007-04-24 — Office action issued
2007-04-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-05-16 — Assigned to lie
2007-05-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-05-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-06-01 — Law office publication review completed
2007-06-20 — Notice of publication
2007-07-10 — Published for opposition
2007-10-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-04-01 — Sou teas extension received
2008-04-01 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-04-01 — Sou extension 1 granted
2008-10-02 — Sou teas extension received
2008-10-02 — Sou extension 2 filed
2008-10-02 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-03-02 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-03-02 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-04-01 — Sou teas extension received
2009-04-01 — Sou extension 3 filed
2009-04-01 — Sou extension 3 granted
2009-08-28 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-11-02 — Application abandoned
2009-11-02 — Application abandoned
2009-11-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SYMMETRIC SPACE CO., LTD.
Seoul KR
SYMMETRIC SPACE CO., LTD.
Seoul KR
Correspondent
Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC 7700 Bonhomme, Suite 400 St. Louis, MO 63105 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-05-25
Status Date:
2009-11-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.